+69.2%
ILMN vs DECK
-21.9%
+91.1%
-10.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.6% | -3.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -2.2% | +3.4% | +1.6% |
| 30D | +9.2% | -13.6% | +22.8% | +11.6% |
| 3M | +29.8% | -21.2% | +51.1% | +35.0% |
| 6M | +69.2% | -21.1% | +90.3% | +77.9% |
| All | +69.2% | -21.9% | +91.1% | +77.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling