+81.4%
ILMN vs CG
-18.0%
+99.4%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | +6.6% | -3.0% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -2.6% | +3.0% | -5.6% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -20.6% | +10.1% | -30.8% | -21.5% |
| 3M | +17.5% | -10.8% | +28.3% | +20.3% |
| 6M | +55.6% | -15.2% | +70.8% | +62.7% |
| YTD | +68.3% | -26.9% | +95.2% | +74.5% |
| All | +81.4% | -18.0% | +99.4% | +76.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling