+83.3%
IEMG vs SCHG
+86.3%
-3.0%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.9% | +0.4% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -1.0% | -0.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -1.3% | +3.2% | +2.7% |
| 3M | +1.4% | +5.4% | -4.0% | -1.8% |
| 6M | +15.2% | +14.4% | +0.8% | +6.7% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +18.2% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +12.7% | +17.9% | +22.0% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +85.6% | -2.3% | +26.9% |
| All | +83.3% | +86.3% | -3.0% | +26.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling