+83.3%
IEMG vs PGR
+75.0%
+8.3%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.7% | +0.6% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.6% | -0.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +4.9% | -3.0% | +2.5% |
| 3M | +1.4% | +7.6% | -6.2% | +2.2% |
| 6M | +15.2% | +8.3% | +6.9% | +16.2% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +1.7% | +22.1% | +24.9% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | -6.8% | +37.5% | +32.1% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +73.4% | +9.8% | +89.7% |
| All | +83.3% | +75.0% | +8.3% | +89.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling