+88.2%
IEMG vs MOD
+331.6%
-243.4%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MOD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +4.3% | -2.6% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +9.6% | -7.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +4.6% | 0.0% | +4.6% | +4.5% |
| 3M | +0.4% | -35.4% | +35.7% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +16.4% | -7.3% | +23.6% | +17.1% |
| YTD | +25.4% | +45.8% | -20.4% | +20.3% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | +43.1% | -4.9% | +32.0% |
| All | +88.2% | +331.6% | -243.4% | +49.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MOD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MOD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MOD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MOD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling