+83.3%
IEMG vs HLT
+99.0%
-15.7%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HLT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -1.6% | +0.3% | -0.8% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -5.0% | +6.9% | +3.4% |
| 3M | +1.4% | -10.4% | +11.8% | +4.7% |
| 6M | +15.2% | +3.2% | +11.9% | +13.5% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +6.7% | +17.1% | +20.8% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +10.3% | +20.4% | +26.0% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +99.3% | -16.1% | +39.5% |
| All | +83.3% | +99.0% | -15.7% | +39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HLT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HLT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HLT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HLT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling