+83.3%
IEMG vs HCA
+59.6%
+23.7%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HCA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.4% | -0.1% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +5.4% | -6.7% | -1.6% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +3.0% | -1.1% | +1.7% |
| 3M | +1.4% | +13.0% | -11.6% | +0.4% |
| 6M | +15.2% | -20.3% | +35.4% | +18.3% |
| YTD | +23.8% | -8.2% | +32.1% | +25.2% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +6.7% | +24.0% | +29.7% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +60.4% | +22.9% | +68.3% |
| All | +83.3% | +59.6% | +23.7% | +68.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HCA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HCA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HCA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HCA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling