+83.3%
IEMG vs FERG
+51.9%
+31.4%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FERG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.7% | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -2.6% | +1.3% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -8.9% | +10.8% | +4.2% |
| 3M | +1.4% | -2.0% | +3.5% | +1.7% |
| 6M | +15.2% | -3.2% | +18.4% | +15.6% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +1.5% | +22.3% | +23.2% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +0.5% | +30.2% | +29.9% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +50.4% | +32.9% | +62.5% |
| All | +83.3% | +51.9% | +31.4% | +62.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FERG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FERG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FERG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FERG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling