+70.0%
IEMG vs FAST
+96.6%
-26.5%
-17.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FAST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +3.0% | -0.1% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +3.8% | -4.0% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -8.8% | +8.1% | -16.8% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -7.2% | +5.8% | -13.0% | -8.2% |
| 6M | -9.8% | +24.9% | -34.7% | -13.8% |
| YTD | +11.4% | +38.9% | -27.5% | +3.9% |
| 1Y | +13.2% | +36.5% | -23.3% | +5.9% |
| 3Y | +70.0% | +98.1% | -28.1% | +45.9% |
| All | +70.0% | +96.6% | -26.5% | +45.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FAST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FAST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FAST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FAST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling