+30.7%
IEMG vs ECHO
+17.8%
+12.8%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.4% | -0.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +3.7% | -5.0% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +1.9% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +1.4% | -27.3% | +28.7% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +15.2% | -17.0% | +32.1% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +23.8% | -14.3% | +38.1% | +24.7% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +20.9% | +9.8% | +28.2% |
| All | +30.7% | +17.8% | +12.8% | +28.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling