+85.3%
IEMG vs DOC
+20.8%
+64.6%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.8% | +3.5% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -1.5% | +3.7% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +4.6% | -4.8% | +9.4% | +5.5% |
| 3M | +0.4% | +6.9% | -6.5% | -1.3% |
| 6M | +16.4% | +20.7% | -4.4% | +11.2% |
| YTD | +25.4% | +34.1% | -8.7% | +17.0% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | +22.6% | +15.6% | +31.3% |
| All | +85.3% | +20.8% | +64.6% | +74.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling