+83.3%
IEMG vs BTI
+109.4%
-26.1%
-17.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.7% | +0.5% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.2% | -1.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -1.1% | +3.0% | +2.0% |
| 3M | +1.4% | -8.8% | +10.2% | +2.2% |
| 6M | +15.2% | -4.0% | +19.1% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +23.8% | +0.4% | +23.5% | +22.8% |
| 1Y | +30.7% | +1.9% | +28.7% | +29.3% |
| 3Y | +83.3% | +108.5% | -25.2% | +55.5% |
| All | +83.3% | +109.4% | -26.1% | +55.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling