+53.6%
IEFA vs UMAC
+488.3%
-434.6%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.2% | +2.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -4.0% | +1.6% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -2.1% | -9.4% | +7.3% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +5.5% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +8.1% | +27.2% | -19.1% | +6.6% |
| YTD | +11.9% | +84.7% | -72.8% | +9.3% |
| 1Y | +18.1% | +136.5% | -118.4% | +14.5% |
| All | +53.6% | +488.3% | -434.6% | +45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling