+63.7%
IEFA vs PH
+133.8%
-70.1%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -3.1% | +0.7% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -2.1% | -11.8% | +9.7% | +1.4% |
| 3M | +5.5% | +6.9% | -1.4% | +3.1% |
| 6M | +8.1% | -1.3% | +9.4% | +7.9% |
| YTD | +11.9% | +7.0% | +5.0% | +9.1% |
| 1Y | +18.1% | +23.1% | -5.0% | +10.3% |
| All | +63.7% | +133.8% | -70.1% | +23.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling