+68.3%
IEFA vs NXT
+171.8%
-103.5%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -3.6% | +2.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -20.0% | +18.9% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +5.1% | -30.9% | +36.0% | +7.9% |
| 6M | +9.3% | -23.8% | +33.1% | +10.9% |
| YTD | +13.0% | -5.4% | +18.4% | +12.4% |
| 1Y | +19.2% | +28.0% | -8.9% | +15.4% |
| 3Y | +67.0% | +93.3% | -26.3% | +51.7% |
| All | +68.3% | +171.8% | -103.5% | +47.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling