+63.7%
IEFA vs NOC
+28.9%
+34.8%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.7% | -1.6% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -1.8% | -0.7% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -2.1% | -9.4% | +7.3% | -1.6% |
| 3M | +5.5% | -3.8% | +9.4% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +8.1% | -28.8% | +36.9% | +10.1% |
| YTD | +11.9% | -7.9% | +19.8% | +12.0% |
| 1Y | +18.1% | -9.0% | +27.1% | +18.3% |
| All | +63.7% | +28.9% | +34.8% | +61.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling