+12.9%
IEFA vs NIO
-55.0%
+67.9%
-11.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -4.9% | +5.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -14.5% | +16.7% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -15.0% | +16.0% | +2.7% |
| 3M | -4.3% | -35.6% | +31.3% | -0.1% |
| 6M | +1.4% | -55.7% | +57.0% | +9.8% |
| YTD | +10.1% | -43.1% | +53.2% | +15.9% |
| 1Y | +12.9% | -53.5% | +66.4% | +21.1% |
| All | +12.9% | -55.0% | +67.9% | +21.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling