+50.4%
IEFA vs NBIX
+59.9%
-9.5%
-30.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -0.2% | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +0.4% | -1.9% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -0.2% | -1.3% | -1.5% |
| 3M | +3.4% | -4.0% | +7.4% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +9.5% | +20.6% | -11.1% | +6.4% |
| YTD | +13.0% | +10.1% | +2.9% | +11.0% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | +8.8% | +9.2% | +15.9% |
| 3Y | +65.4% | +42.5% | +22.9% | +52.7% |
| All | +50.4% | +59.9% | -9.5% | +33.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling