+79.9%
IEFA vs BAM
+78.0%
+1.9%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.6% | -0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -2.0% | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +1.0% | -2.9% | +4.0% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +4.7% | +9.4% | -4.7% | +1.7% |
| 6M | +8.6% | +10.8% | -2.2% | +4.8% |
| YTD | +14.8% | -0.4% | +15.3% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | -10.9% | +33.5% | +25.3% |
| 3Y | +67.0% | +61.3% | +5.8% | +39.1% |
| All | +79.9% | +78.0% | +1.9% | +45.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling