+65.2%
IEFA vs ALM
+2,150.5%
-2,085.2%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -4.1% | +3.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +3.6% | -4.1% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -1.1% | +33.8% | -34.9% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +5.1% | +14.8% | -9.7% | +4.0% |
| 6M | +9.3% | -7.0% | +16.3% | +8.6% |
| YTD | +13.0% | +108.1% | -95.1% | +9.5% |
| 1Y | +19.2% | +313.8% | -294.6% | +12.8% |
| All | +65.2% | +2,150.5% | -2,085.2% | +49.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling