+63.7%
IEFA vs AG
+260.2%
-196.5%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -4.9% | +3.9% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -5.8% | +3.4% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -2.1% | +6.4% | -8.5% | -2.9% |
| 3M | +5.5% | +28.4% | -22.8% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +8.1% | -24.5% | +32.6% | +9.8% |
| YTD | +11.9% | +21.2% | -9.3% | +8.1% |
| 1Y | +18.1% | +114.1% | -96.0% | +7.1% |
| All | +63.7% | +260.2% | -196.5% | +37.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling