+68.8%
IEFA vs ABCL
+105.4%
-36.6%
-13.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +0.1% | -0.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +1.4% | -0.3% | +1.1% |
| 30D | -0.6% | +65.1% | -65.7% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +6.2% | +111.1% | -104.9% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +11.2% | +231.6% | -220.4% | 0.0% |
| YTD | +14.2% | +234.5% | -220.3% | +2.1% |
| 1Y | +20.0% | +174.3% | -154.3% | +8.3% |
| 3Y | +68.8% | +111.5% | -42.7% | +52.3% |
| All | +68.8% | +105.4% | -36.6% | +52.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling