+17.5%
ICE vs UMAC
+488.3%
-470.7%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -3.2% | +2.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -5.3% | -4.0% | -1.3% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +3.0% | -9.4% | +12.4% | +3.0% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +3.0% | +8.5% | +11.2% |
| 6M | -2.0% | +27.2% | -29.2% | -2.8% |
| YTD | -3.1% | +84.7% | -87.8% | -4.4% |
| 1Y | -8.4% | +136.5% | -144.9% | -9.9% |
| All | +17.5% | +488.3% | -470.7% | +13.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling