+17.0%
ICE vs NIO
-53.2%
+70.2%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -5.9% | +4.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -4.7% | +6.9% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +13.7% | -14.3% | +28.0% | +13.7% |
| 3M | +17.9% | -32.8% | +50.7% | +17.8% |
| 6M | +15.0% | -49.8% | +64.8% | +14.8% |
| YTD | +10.9% | -40.2% | +51.1% | +11.9% |
| 1Y | +17.0% | -52.7% | +69.7% | +20.6% |
| All | +17.0% | -53.2% | +70.2% | +20.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling