+20.6%
ICE vs NIO
-54.1%
+74.7%
-29.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | +3.4% | -1.1% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +12.2% | -0.6% | +12.8% | +12.1% |
| 30D | +15.0% | -3.5% | +18.5% | +14.9% |
| 3M | +17.6% | -30.7% | +48.3% | +17.3% |
| 6M | +12.6% | -45.6% | +58.2% | +12.1% |
| YTD | +9.1% | -35.3% | +44.4% | +9.9% |
| 1Y | +20.6% | -53.9% | +74.5% | +22.0% |
| All | +20.6% | -54.1% | +74.7% | +22.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling