+69.9%
ICE vs FND
-38.2%
+108.1%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -4.4% | +2.9% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +2.2% | -5.1% | +7.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +13.7% | +9.2% | +4.5% | +12.8% |
| 3M | +17.9% | -17.7% | +35.6% | +19.4% |
| 6M | +15.0% | +2.5% | +12.5% | +13.8% |
| YTD | +10.9% | -19.8% | +30.8% | +12.0% |
| 1Y | +17.0% | -22.7% | +39.7% | +18.5% |
| All | +69.9% | -38.2% | +108.1% | +76.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling