-4.7%
IBM vs ZM
+37.9%
-42.6%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +3.3% | -3.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +2.9% | -3.2% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +0.7% | -0.4% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -3.7% | -17.9% | -21.4% |
| 6M | -4.7% | +29.9% | -34.6% | -17.2% |
| All | -4.7% | +37.9% | -42.6% | -17.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling