+80.4%
IBM vs XLP
+42.1%
+38.3%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.3% | +0.4% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +0.7% | -5.7% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +11.1% | +10.3% | +0.8% | +6.6% |
| 3M | +5.7% | +6.5% | -0.8% | +2.8% |
| 6M | +10.1% | +8.4% | +1.7% | +6.5% |
| YTD | -15.6% | +18.2% | -33.8% | -23.5% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +22.4% | -42.0% | -28.9% |
| 3Y | +80.4% | +41.9% | +38.5% | +47.2% |
| All | +80.4% | +42.1% | +38.3% | +47.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling