+72.4%
IBM vs VOO
+79.1%
-6.7%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.6% | -0.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +0.5% | -0.2% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -0.9% | -0.6% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +3.9% | -20.7% | -19.4% |
| 6M | -9.0% | +14.5% | -23.6% | -18.4% |
| YTD | -20.1% | +13.0% | -33.0% | -27.2% |
| 1Y | -7.0% | +19.4% | -26.4% | -18.7% |
| 3Y | +72.4% | +78.9% | -6.5% | +15.6% |
| All | +72.4% | +79.1% | -6.7% | +15.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling