+82.6%
IBM vs VLTO
+27.2%
+55.4%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VLTO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.7% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -2.3% | +2.0% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -0.9% | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +13.8% | -35.4% | -24.6% |
| 6M | -4.7% | +2.0% | -6.7% | -5.1% |
| YTD | -19.1% | -3.2% | -15.9% | -18.0% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | -9.2% | +6.7% | +0.7% |
| All | +82.6% | +27.2% | +55.4% | +78.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VLTO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VLTO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VLTO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VLTO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling