+35.9%
IBM vs UMAC
+549.5%
-513.6%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +9.3% | -10.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +14.7% | -14.4% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -0.5% | -1.0% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +0.5% | -17.3% | -16.9% |
| 6M | -9.0% | +57.9% | -67.0% | -10.0% |
| YTD | -20.1% | +103.9% | -124.0% | -21.2% |
| 1Y | -7.0% | +159.3% | -166.3% | -8.6% |
| All | +35.9% | +549.5% | -513.6% | +29.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling