+73.0%
IBM vs SCHG
+84.7%
-11.7%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.4% | -2.0% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -2.7% | +2.4% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -2.2% | +0.4% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -13.5% | +6.2% | -19.6% | -16.4% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +13.4% | -18.5% | -11.3% |
| YTD | -19.4% | +7.1% | -26.5% | -22.4% |
| 1Y | -6.5% | +12.5% | -19.1% | -12.1% |
| All | +73.0% | +84.7% | -11.7% | +32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling