+30.0%
IBM vs RDDT
+217.8%
-187.8%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RDDT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -3.3% | +2.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +3.3% | -3.0% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -1.5% | -7.6% | +6.1% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -16.8% | -12.7% | -4.1% | -16.6% |
| 6M | -9.0% | +7.2% | -16.2% | -9.9% |
| YTD | -20.1% | -35.0% | +15.0% | -19.6% |
| 1Y | -7.0% | -35.0% | +28.0% | -6.8% |
| All | +30.0% | +217.8% | -187.8% | +27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RDDT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RDDT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RDDT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RDDT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling