+72.4%
IBM vs QID
-74.5%
+146.9%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.3% | -1.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -2.7% | +3.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +1.8% | -3.3% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -16.8% | -2.2% | -14.6% | -17.0% |
| 6M | -9.0% | -32.1% | +23.1% | -16.9% |
| YTD | -20.1% | -28.6% | +8.5% | -25.6% |
| 1Y | -7.0% | -36.3% | +29.3% | -15.4% |
| 3Y | +72.4% | -74.4% | +146.8% | +36.3% |
| All | +72.4% | -74.5% | +146.9% | +36.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling