+82.1%
IBM vs PENG
+191.6%
-109.6%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +9.3% | -8.8% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -3.8% | +1.3% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +8.4% | -40.1% | +48.4% | +11.8% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -21.8% | +26.3% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +7.9% | +3.3% | +4.6% | +2.8% |
| YTD | -15.2% | +133.6% | -148.9% | -27.7% |
| 1Y | -17.6% | +110.7% | -128.3% | -29.0% |
| 3Y | +82.1% | +204.3% | -122.2% | +41.8% |
| All | +82.1% | +191.6% | -109.6% | +41.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling