-2.9%
IBM vs NTRA
+92.9%
-95.8%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +0.9% | +3.1% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +3.6% | +0.2% | +3.3% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +3.1% | +4.1% | -1.0% | +2.5% |
| 3M | -10.8% | +50.0% | -60.9% | -16.7% |
| 6M | -0.8% | +67.3% | -68.1% | -9.9% |
| YTD | -16.2% | +43.6% | -59.8% | -23.1% |
| 1Y | -2.9% | +89.2% | -92.1% | -14.2% |
| All | -2.9% | +92.9% | -95.8% | -14.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling