+77.4%
IBM vs MDLZ
-2.9%
+80.3%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.6% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +1.4% | +0.1% | +1.3% |
| 3M | -12.9% | 0.0% | -12.9% | -13.2% |
| 6M | -3.9% | +9.1% | -13.0% | -5.3% |
| YTD | -17.3% | +17.9% | -35.3% | -20.5% |
| 1Y | -5.0% | +3.2% | -8.2% | -5.6% |
| All | +77.4% | -2.9% | +80.3% | +74.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling