+73.0%
IBM vs MCO
+40.3%
+32.7%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.5% | -0.9% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -7.3% | +7.0% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -1.7% | -0.1% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -13.5% | +3.9% | -17.4% | -15.3% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +3.8% | -8.9% | -7.1% |
| YTD | -19.4% | -7.9% | -11.5% | -16.9% |
| 1Y | -6.5% | -6.8% | +0.3% | -4.4% |
| All | +73.0% | +40.3% | +32.7% | +51.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling