+74.7%
IBM vs MAR
+71.3%
+3.3%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +0.1% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -4.2% | +3.9% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -6.7% | +7.0% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -12.5% | -9.1% | -18.8% |
| 6M | -4.7% | +0.6% | -5.3% | -6.2% |
| YTD | -19.1% | +9.1% | -28.2% | -22.6% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | +26.2% | -28.7% | -11.5% |
| All | +74.7% | +71.3% | +3.3% | +43.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling