+115.5%
IBM vs LCID
-97.6%
+213.1%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +1.7% | -1.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -6.6% | +6.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +0.3% | -30.1% | +30.4% | +2.6% |
| 3M | -21.6% | -17.6% | -4.0% | -21.1% |
| 6M | -4.7% | -54.4% | +49.7% | -1.4% |
| YTD | -19.1% | -55.7% | +36.6% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -2.5% | -71.0% | +68.5% | +2.5% |
| 3Y | +74.2% | -92.6% | +166.8% | +88.7% |
| All | +115.5% | -97.6% | +213.1% | +141.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling