+77.4%
IBM vs HUM
-11.5%
+88.9%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | -0.8% | +4.1% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -0.2% | +3.8% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +3.7% | -2.2% | +1.5% |
| 3M | -12.9% | +10.4% | -23.3% | -13.0% |
| 6M | -3.9% | +125.7% | -129.6% | -5.1% |
| YTD | -17.3% | +57.3% | -74.7% | -18.3% |
| 1Y | -5.0% | +48.6% | -53.6% | -6.1% |
| All | +77.4% | -11.5% | +88.9% | +62.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling