-19.5%
IBM vs HTZ
-75.3%
+55.8%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -8.4% | +7.5% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -14.6% | +9.6% | -4.4% |
| 30D | +11.1% | -20.8% | +31.9% | +11.9% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -18.8% | +24.5% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +10.1% | -74.7% | +84.8% | +21.0% |
| YTD | -15.6% | -68.1% | +52.5% | -11.2% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | -73.5% | +53.9% | -14.0% |
| All | -19.5% | -75.3% | +55.8% | -14.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling