+80.3%
IBM vs HAS
+215.8%
-135.5%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.7% | -0.7% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.5% | +3.3% | -4.8% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +8.4% | +30.5% | -22.1% | +3.4% |
| 3M | +4.2% | +29.9% | -25.7% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +7.9% | +26.5% | -18.6% | +3.4% |
| YTD | -15.2% | +51.9% | -67.1% | -21.7% |
| 1Y | -18.7% | +60.9% | -79.6% | -25.8% |
| All | +80.3% | +215.8% | -135.5% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling