+83.0%
IBM vs GIS
-39.1%
+122.2%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GIS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.1% | +2.6% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -1.7% | -4.6% | +2.9% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +10.1% | +6.6% | +3.5% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -8.1% | +12.9% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +12.6% | +4.9% | +7.7% | +11.8% |
| YTD | -13.9% | -21.4% | +7.5% | -12.3% |
| 1Y | -18.7% | -21.6% | +2.9% | -17.2% |
| All | +83.0% | -39.1% | +122.2% | +95.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GIS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GIS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GIS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GIS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling