+72.4%
IBM vs EWT
+199.6%
-127.2%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EWT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -0.6% | -0.6% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +0.3% | +1.6% | -1.3% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +8.2% | -9.7% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -16.8% | +11.1% | -27.8% | -20.1% |
| 6M | -9.0% | +60.4% | -69.5% | -23.4% |
| YTD | -20.1% | +75.6% | -95.6% | -35.1% |
| 1Y | -7.0% | +91.3% | -98.3% | -26.9% |
| 3Y | +72.4% | +200.3% | -127.9% | +14.1% |
| All | +72.4% | +199.6% | -127.2% | +14.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EWT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EWT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EWT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EWT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling