-3.9%
IBM vs EQH
+36.7%
-40.6%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EQH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +0.1% | +3.3% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +3.6% | +1.1% | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +1.5% | -1.1% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -12.9% | +25.0% | -37.9% | -18.9% |
| 6M | -3.9% | +33.9% | -37.8% | -13.1% |
| All | -3.9% | +36.7% | -40.6% | -13.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling