+80.4%
IBM vs EPAM
-33.7%
+114.1%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.9% | +3.0% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +13.4% | -18.3% | -8.5% |
| 30D | +11.1% | +47.1% | -36.0% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +5.7% | +71.2% | -65.5% | -9.0% |
| 6M | +10.1% | +48.9% | -38.8% | -2.9% |
| YTD | -15.6% | -22.2% | +6.6% | -15.1% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | -5.2% | -14.4% | -21.8% |
| 3Y | +80.4% | -34.9% | +115.3% | +84.3% |
| All | +80.4% | -33.7% | +114.1% | +84.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling