-16.7%
IBM vs ENTG
+78.6%
-95.3%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -3.8% | +4.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.6% | +15.2% | -13.6% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +9.2% | -3.6% | +12.8% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +4.9% | -10.0% | +14.9% | +4.5% |
| 6M | +16.8% | +1.8% | +15.0% | +15.7% |
| YTD | -14.3% | +75.5% | -89.8% | -21.5% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +82.4% | -99.1% | -24.2% |
| All | -16.7% | +78.6% | -95.3% | -24.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling