+82.2%
IBM vs DIA
+60.3%
+22.0%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DIA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.6% | +2.1% | -0.6% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +9.2% | +1.5% | +7.7% | +7.5% |
| 3M | +4.9% | -2.4% | +7.4% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +16.8% | +6.0% | +10.8% | +10.4% |
| YTD | -14.3% | +10.1% | -24.4% | -21.5% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +11.8% | -28.5% | -24.9% |
| 3Y | +82.2% | +59.7% | +22.5% | +16.4% |
| All | +82.2% | +60.3% | +22.0% | +16.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DIA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DIA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DIA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DIA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling