+116.3%
IBM vs CRDO
+1,287.8%
-1,171.4%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CRDO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | +0.1% | +3.3% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +3.6% | +1.6% | +1.9% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +1.5% | -30.0% | +31.6% | +3.3% |
| 3M | -12.9% | -28.3% | +15.4% | -12.3% |
| 6M | -3.9% | +44.8% | -48.7% | -8.4% |
| YTD | -17.3% | +16.7% | -34.0% | -20.5% |
| 1Y | -5.0% | +12.7% | -17.7% | -9.1% |
| 3Y | +78.2% | +960.1% | -881.9% | +39.9% |
| All | +116.3% | +1,287.8% | -1,171.4% | +58.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CRDO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CRDO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CRDO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CRDO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling